New Methods Of Distribution, Or Decimation?

The Internet is a sword that cuts both ways for content creators, be it filmmakers or other kinds of artists. While there is a lot of possibility in the medium, it has been notoriously difficult to turn a profit via online distribution. There are three main reasons for this:

a) Technical limitations: Long-form video is not very much fun to watch over the kinds of connections most people have. Because of this the average length of video that people will watch, according to many self-proclaimed web video experts, is about three minutes. One result of this situation is that three to five minutes has become the standard length for “webisodes”. Anything that is longer than that is considered to be “pushing the boundaries”. Listening to music over the Internet used to be too much traffic for the network to reliably deliver, so this situation probably won’t last forever, but when the technical limitations for smooth streaming feature-length content will be overcome is really not certain.

b) User experience: The user experience for online film viewing is not great. Not only the technical limitations, but the viewing UI and context. Embedded browser video is often displayed too small, and surrounded by distracting advertisements and other ancillary content. The different user improvements brought to online music listening that were delivered by iTunes and Pandora, respectively, need to happen for video. Recent web-embedded players that can go full screen are a start, but the content location and management services for video are quite lacking.

c) Pricing: Torrents and other tools of the theftosphere have created the expectation in far too many people that everyone in the world will give their work away for free (except, of course, when you ask avid torrenters to give you the fruits of their own labor for free). The fallacious argument that is used for bands (that the downloads should be free so the band can make money attracting people to pay for live shows) doesn’t even have a prayer of holding up when it comes to filmmaking.

What video content creators need to do is split the difference: give away free trailers and short films that will create goodwill (because you’re playing the “give us something for free” game) and if it’s good enough also drive viewers to your premium content. Then you need to deliver to the viewer paid content that is as good as or better than the stolen goods available online (and you may be surprised at how high that bar really is — some torrentable video actually looks better than commercially available DVDs).

photo by Sasira (http://www.flickr.com/photos/sasira/3983753349/)

So far the Internet has been a good publicity vehicle, but has not been a very good place to distribute work in order to make money to support yourself as filmmaker. But progress is being made.

(read more “below the fold”)

NoLo Shooters’ Holiday Wishlist

Here are some last-minute Holiday shopping ideas for the No Budget / Low Budget (NoLo) filmmaker in your life. Glancing at the prices, one thing you’ll notice is that even at the low end, quality filmmaking isn’t really a “no-budget” proposition.

Most “no-budget” filmmakers are able to work “no-budget” because they have access to equipment through a school, work, or local film/video coalition that loans out gear. True “no-budget” shooters can work with an under $1000 consumer camcorder that has paltry imaging control settings and use only available light. But once you grow tired of just how awful ninety percent of your footage looks when shooting that way, then it’s time to invest in some decent gear. Renting, of course, is also an option. It depends on how much you shoot.

So if the filmmaker in your life is active enough to use their equipment so often it’d be cheaper to buy than rent, here’s some gear to consider:

(read more “below the fold”)

Holiday Films

I’ve been so busy wrapping-up stuff at Pixar before a 2 week vacation, gift buying, travel planning, working on a couple of screenplay projects, and dealing with end of year financials that all the exciting Indie Auteur blog posts I thought I had on-deck are languishing due to lack of mental space.  So here’s a round-up of my favorite Holiday films, ones that I think are fine examples of filmmaking craft and storytelling as well as merely being enjoyable.


This is the best holiday film ever made, in my opinion. A Christmas Story captures both the joy and chaos of the holiday season, and is one of the most accurate depictions of both family dynamics and the mind of a kid I’ve seen. The style and cadence of the writing, directing, and editing is brilliant, creating an homage to the classic Christmas movies of the old studio system, yet at the same time it takes the piss out of them with a much more realistic (and ultimately much more charming) view of the holiday. Even though I’ve seen this film probably a hundred times, it still makes me laugh.

Bad Santa is a good study in how to make a seemingly despicable character likable, or at least empathizable. It’s got a very clear character arc, and the juxtaposition of Christmas and the very inappropriate behavior of the main character is absolutely hilarious. It’s both heartwarming and incredibly obnoxious — a combination I can appreciate.

Scrooged is my favorite adaptation of Dickens’ classic story, one which is quite unfaithful to the letter of the original but very faithful to the spirit. Everyone already knows the story, so the success of this film is based on how well it was adapted to modern sensibilities, and great performances (the most memorable being Carol Kane as the Ghost of Christmas Present).

Most people don’t think of Die Hard as a Holiday movie, but it does take place during Christmas, and there is an undercurrent of redemption and reconciliation beneath the action film veneer. It’s also one of the most compelling action films ever made, due in large part to the personality Bruce Willis and Alan Rickman put into their characters (and their great on-screen rivalry).

The Ron Howard / Jim Carrey version of The Grinch is a mistake that filmmakers should learn from: the canonical remake rule is that you should take something that had a good idea at its core, but wasn’t excellent in its execution, and make it better. You shouldn’t take a beloved holiday classic and turn it into a smartass version of itself that relies on visual advances made since the original was produced, and cheap gags.

The original is only 26 minutes long and made for TV, but it’s narrated by Boris Karloff and the animation helmed by Chuck Jones, for Pete’s sake. Nothing was gained by making the story longer and goofier, and the short 1966 TV version is the one worth watching. It’s a great holiday classic, one set in the amusingly surrealistic world of Dr. Seuss, that’s neither too saccharine nor too silly.

The Nightmare Before Christmas is a musical fairy tale told in a classical style, but with the surrealistic twist found in all films by Tim Burton and/or Henry Selick. It’s ultimately a film about learning to love oneself and not be jealous of others, like The Grinch. In addition to a simple, albeit compelling and enjoyable story, it also has great set pieces and character design.

Finally, I wish there were some good non-Christmas Holiday movies out there to put on this list, but I just couldn’t think of any. If you know of a very good or better movie about the Winter Solstice, Chanukkah, Kwanzaa, Eid al-Adha, or any other December Holiday, post a comment.

But all of the films listed above are quite secular in nature, which suits a non-religious person like me just fine, and should also be enjoyable for anyone of any religious background who isn’t a judgmental zealot.

Filed under: General

Friends’ Films: The Kinematograph and 36 Stairs

My friend Grzegorsz Jonkajtys (director), creator of the award winning animated short The Ark, and and Philip Koch (producer) are working on a great new (live action w/ VFX) short film called 36 Stairs.

36 Stairs

36 Stairs

Check out the trailer, and donate to help get it finished, if you can.

And not too long ago my friends Tomek Baginski (director) and Marcin Kobylecki (producer), the guys behind the award winning shorts Cathedral (which was also Academy Award nominated) and Fallen Art, released a new short called The Kinematograph (the trailer is on that site).

The Kinematograph

The Kinematograph

Another great short from a great animation director.

Making friends with fellow filmmakers not only gives you someone to talk to who understands what you’re going on about all the time, but it’s also a source of inspiration, a kick in the butt to see your friends doing things when you’re dragging your feet because some project just isn’t working right and you’re letting it get to you, and — if you don’t take advantage of people, and are yourself generous with  assistance — a fellowship of likeminded folks who will be there with relevant knowledge, skills and contacts to help you when you most need it.

So support your friends, because they’re the only ones who are even going to consider supporting you when you’re just getting started.  If you look at everyone around you as nothing but competition, in a collaborative medium like filmmaking, you’re going to have a very rough go of it.

Notes on Notes, pt. 4: Who to ask for notes.

This post is mainly for independent writers and directors.  If you’re working for someone on a project, it’s usually quite obvious who you should ask for notes (and if it isn’t, ask the director or producer).  Independents, on the other hand, may have a very hard time finding people to give them a “fresh set of eyes”.

For starters, don’t ask Josh Olson for notes.  In fact, don’t ask anyone for notes that is unlikely to give them to you (especially if they’re prone to ranting at you).  That category includes everyone you’ve ever heard of in the business, unless either (1) they explicitly ask you to send them a copy of your script or film cut, or (2) you are somebody (i.e. a peer) in the business.  Even if the well known person is an actual friend, it’s usually best to wait for them to ask to read or view something you’re working on based on your telling them about what the project is.  (This is called pitching, and it’s the primary way many scripts get read and films get funded or picked-up — by generating active interest in the story via a short synopsis.)  If you pester someone into giving you feedback, expect the harshest criticism since they didn’t want to do it in the first place and will therefore be sensitive to every flaw in your work.

Getting feedback, however, is not that hard if you know how to go about it.  From the suggestions below, you want to cast about for note givers whose notes you respect and can learn from, until you find a pool of people large enough that you can ask about five of them for notes on any given project (how many people that means depends on how prolific you are — don’t ask any one person for notes more than once every 2 – 3 months, unless you’ve got a very long term friendship or a very close working relationship with them).

Ask your friends

Some of them are going to be too nice to you, others too harsh out of jealousy, but you might as well ask for notes from the one or two of your friends that you think can be the most straightforward.  The idea that asking your friends for feedback is a bad idea because they may not be experts has one clear flaw: Your friends are your audience.  Most people who go see moves do not know how to write or make them, yet they are going to critique your work anyway.  It’s not a bad idea to get some feedback from people like that up-front.  You will have to guide them, and you’ll probably get a lot of terrible notes from your friends, but hearing about where they are bored or confused is especially helpful since that’s where a general audience may also be bored or confused.  Just don’t take your friends notes too seriously, they are indeed biased, after all.

As time goes on, you’ll make friends with other writers or directors, professional readers, producers, and other industry professionals and well trained aspirants who will both be your friends and also be excellent sources of knowledable notes. These are likely to be your most consistently available source of actually helpful notes, provided you return the favor for them when needed.  But keep at least one reader in your pool who isn’t a pro, because knowing how the average person responds is helpful, even through all the bad notes you’ll get.  (NOTE: Your non-pro friends being a poor audience is mainly true of screenplays, anyway, as those can be confusing and difficult to read for non-experts.  Those friends who aren’t pros are actually a great audience for edits of actual films, because they’re the closest you’re going to get to a public test audience without paying for one.)

Take classes

Even some very experienced writers and filmmakers (usually ones who haven’t broken into the A-list yet) still take workshop classes like those offered by the UCLA Professional Program, or labs like CineStory or Sundance.   Classes serve three major purposes: (1) providing you with deadlines, (2) providing you with a group of people who are obligated to give you notes, and (3) meeting people with whom you may later exchange notes and perhaps even collaborate with on projects.  Classes are the best way to meet people and build relationships that may go from exchanging notes to something more concrete later on.

You may get some terrible notes from classmates, but you’ll also get some very good notes if you pick classes that are at serious places for serious people. Since UCLA offers online classes, there’s no reason to stay in an awful class, but don’t completely discount local courses (especially those at city and state colleges).  Be cautious when considering for-profit adult education programs.  They rarely offer anything that city and state colleges don’t, and are often overpriced for the quality of teachers and students you’ll be working with.

Getting an MFA is also a way to get a lot of critique of your work.  In the U.S., there are the Big Three film schools (UCLA, USC, NYU) and the AFI.  But if you can’t go to any of those, there are also other decent programs out there like Columbia, UT, and various others.  In the UK, there is NFTS, and other countries have major film schools as well.

Join a writing and/or filmmaking group

Many writing and filmmaking critique groups form out of class or retreat relationships, so the two suggestions are compatible.  But even if you haven’t taken any classes, you may find a group in your area through friends, a local college or library, or an online message board.  Some regions may also have film organizations (like San Francisco’s now defunct Film Arts Foundation) that have bulletin boards where you can post looking for a group, and which also host events where you can go meet in-person and try to form a group that way.

There are also online sites which function as virtual critique groups.  Some are just bulletin board forums, such as those at Save The Cat, where you can discuss craft, meet people virtually,  and post requests for critique.  But there are also a couple sites, Trigger Street and Zoetrope, which are specifically critique communities in which you must give critiques in order to receive them.  The whole purpose of those sites is to have users give each other notes, both to help each other, and so that the highest reviewed projects on the sites can be considered by production companies.  Since Trigger Street and Zoetrope are organized forums for exchanging notes, if you give notes, you will also get them.

Only under very particular circumstances — pay someone

Sometimes you’d like notes from a professional reader — the very sort of person who may read your work for a company you sendit to.  Surprisingly, this is quite difficult to find, and even more difficult to find at a fair price.  The only paid notes I’ve found thus far that are worth the price is Scott The Reader’s $60 notes offer, and sometimes the notes I get back from Wildsound and Austin Film Festival.  My general rule is that I will not pay more than about $80 for notes (not consulting, mind you, but a single read and one-time delivery of a packet of notes), unless they are exceptionally amazing and detailed notes.  And I’ve not yet found a notes giver that I’d pay more than $80 for.  Honestly, in terms of disinterested third-party readers that give decent or better notes, I’ve only found the three mentioned above at all.

Also, many people selling note services are not professional readers, they’re professional consultants.  Most professional readers only resell their services outside the studios through festivals (I’ve only found one so far that offers direct service — Scott).  Consultants can occasionally be worth working with — even some A-listers work with story and script consultants — if you have developed a personal relationship with them.  Most of the successful writers who work with a consultant at all usually work with someone that was a professor or mentor of theirs in their MFA or professional program, or at a retreat, workshop or festival.  It’s meeting the person and hitting it off with them that’s most important, though vetting their credits and credentials is also important (con artistry works because those people seem nice and helpful at first, so do your homework when meeting someone new).

For example I always take classes with, and get script notes from, the same professor: Tim Albaugh.  I wouldn’t have worked with him as a consultant, though, if I’d just stumbled upon his website.  It’s the personal relationship that’s important, because otherwise your chances of feeling ripped-off by a consultant are very high (because many — perhaps most — of them are worse than useless, and those that are good can seem terrible if your styles are incompatible).

Get representation and/or work with a producer

All of these recommendations are especially relevant before you manage to get a manager or develop a relationship with a producer who wants to take an active role in developing you and/or some of your work.  Once you do manage to secure one or both of those relationships, your primary notes will come from your manager and/or producer.  Most producers and managers will give you excellent, detailed notes and work with you to see your way through implementing them.  Their notes will be geared towards making your work sellable by them, and may conflict with your vision for the project.  Your job will be to persuade them to stay as close to your vision as possible, while recognizing the issues they’re raising with your material and addressing them in a way that gets at the core underlying problems which may genuinely cause problems for an audience.  That’s your job as a writer or director — to understand the material, and address issues with it in order to make it the best implementation of that material possible.

Working with a manager and/or producer will take your notes to the next level — but you’ll also still want to get notes from about five people for each major draft of each project.  So keep those friends, mentors and hired readers handy, because you’ll always want a group of people you can trust who will give you notes about your work that are as agenda-free as humanly possible.