NoLo Shooters’ Holiday Wishlist
Here are some last-minute Holiday shopping ideas for the No Budget / Low Budget (NoLo) filmmaker in your life. Glancing at the prices, one thing you’ll notice is that even at the low end, quality filmmaking isn’t really a “no-budget” proposition.
Most “no-budget” filmmakers are able to work “no-budget” because they have access to equipment through a school, work, or local film/video coalition that loans out gear. True “no-budget” shooters can work with an under $1000 consumer camcorder that has paltry imaging control settings and use only available light. But once you grow tired of just how awful ninety percent of your footage looks when shooting that way, then it’s time to invest in some decent gear. Renting, of course, is also an option. It depends on how much you shoot.
So if the filmmaker in your life is active enough to use their equipment so often it’d be cheaper to buy than rent, here’s some gear to consider:
Holiday Films
I’ve been so busy wrapping-up stuff at Pixar before a 2 week vacation, gift buying, travel planning, working on a couple of screenplay projects, and dealing with end of year financials that all the exciting Indie Auteur blog posts I thought I had on-deck are languishing due to lack of mental space. So here’s a round-up of my favorite Holiday films, ones that I think are fine examples of filmmaking craft and storytelling as well as merely being enjoyable.
This is the best holiday film ever made, in my opinion. A Christmas Story captures both the joy and chaos of the holiday season, and is one of the most accurate depictions of both family dynamics and the mind of a kid I’ve seen. The style and cadence of the writing, directing, and editing is brilliant, creating an homage to the classic Christmas movies of the old studio system, yet at the same time it takes the piss out of them with a much more realistic (and ultimately much more charming) view of the holiday. Even though I’ve seen this film probably a hundred times, it still makes me laugh.
Bad Santa is a good study in how to make a seemingly despicable character likable, or at least empathizable. It’s got a very clear character arc, and the juxtaposition of Christmas and the very inappropriate behavior of the main character is absolutely hilarious. It’s both heartwarming and incredibly obnoxious — a combination I can appreciate.
Scrooged is my favorite adaptation of Dickens’ classic story, one which is quite unfaithful to the letter of the original but very faithful to the spirit. Everyone already knows the story, so the success of this film is based on how well it was adapted to modern sensibilities, and great performances (the most memorable being Carol Kane as the Ghost of Christmas Present).
Most people don’t think of Die Hard as a Holiday movie, but it does take place during Christmas, and there is an undercurrent of redemption and reconciliation beneath the action film veneer. It’s also one of the most compelling action films ever made, due in large part to the personality Bruce Willis and Alan Rickman put into their characters (and their great on-screen rivalry).
The Ron Howard / Jim Carrey version of The Grinch is a mistake that filmmakers should learn from: the canonical remake rule is that you should take something that had a good idea at its core, but wasn’t excellent in its execution, and make it better. You shouldn’t take a beloved holiday classic and turn it into a smartass version of itself that relies on visual advances made since the original was produced, and cheap gags.
The original is only 26 minutes long and made for TV, but it’s narrated by Boris Karloff and the animation helmed by Chuck Jones, for Pete’s sake. Nothing was gained by making the story longer and goofier, and the short 1966 TV version is the one worth watching. It’s a great holiday classic, one set in the amusingly surrealistic world of Dr. Seuss, that’s neither too saccharine nor too silly.
The Nightmare Before Christmas is a musical fairy tale told in a classical style, but with the surrealistic twist found in all films by Tim Burton and/or Henry Selick. It’s ultimately a film about learning to love oneself and not be jealous of others, like The Grinch. In addition to a simple, albeit compelling and enjoyable story, it also has great set pieces and character design.
Finally, I wish there were some good non-Christmas Holiday movies out there to put on this list, but I just couldn’t think of any. If you know of a very good or better movie about the Winter Solstice, Chanukkah, Kwanzaa, Eid al-Adha, or any other December Holiday, post a comment.
But all of the films listed above are quite secular in nature, which suits a non-religious person like me just fine, and should also be enjoyable for anyone of any religious background who isn’t a judgmental zealot.
Friends’ Films: The Kinematograph and 36 Stairs
My friend Grzegorsz Jonkajtys (director), creator of the award winning animated short The Ark, and and Philip Koch (producer) are working on a great new (live action w/ VFX) short film called 36 Stairs.

36 Stairs
Check out the trailer, and donate to help get it finished, if you can.
And not too long ago my friends Tomek Baginski (director) and Marcin Kobylecki (producer), the guys behind the award winning shorts Cathedral (which was also Academy Award nominated) and Fallen Art, released a new short called The Kinematograph (the trailer is on that site).

The Kinematograph
Another great short from a great animation director.
Making friends with fellow filmmakers not only gives you someone to talk to who understands what you’re going on about all the time, but it’s also a source of inspiration, a kick in the butt to see your friends doing things when you’re dragging your feet because some project just isn’t working right and you’re letting it get to you, and — if you don’t take advantage of people, and are yourself generous with assistance — a fellowship of likeminded folks who will be there with relevant knowledge, skills and contacts to help you when you most need it.
So support your friends, because they’re the only ones who are even going to consider supporting you when you’re just getting started. If you look at everyone around you as nothing but competition, in a collaborative medium like filmmaking, you’re going to have a very rough go of it.
Notes on Notes, pt. 4: Who to ask for notes.
This post is mainly for independent writers and directors. If you’re working for someone on a project, it’s usually quite obvious who you should ask for notes (and if it isn’t, ask the director or producer). Independents, on the other hand, may have a very hard time finding people to give them a “fresh set of eyes”.
For starters, don’t ask Josh Olson for notes. In fact, don’t ask anyone for notes that is unlikely to give them to you (especially if they’re prone to ranting at you). That category includes everyone you’ve ever heard of in the business, unless either (1) they explicitly ask you to send them a copy of your script or film cut, or (2) you are somebody (i.e. a peer) in the business. Even if the well known person is an actual friend, it’s usually best to wait for them to ask to read or view something you’re working on based on your telling them about what the project is. (This is called pitching, and it’s the primary way many scripts get read and films get funded or picked-up — by generating active interest in the story via a short synopsis.) If you pester someone into giving you feedback, expect the harshest criticism since they didn’t want to do it in the first place and will therefore be sensitive to every flaw in your work.
Getting feedback, however, is not that hard if you know how to go about it. From the suggestions below, you want to cast about for note givers whose notes you respect and can learn from, until you find a pool of people large enough that you can ask about five of them for notes on any given project (how many people that means depends on how prolific you are — don’t ask any one person for notes more than once every 2 – 3 months, unless you’ve got a very long term friendship or a very close working relationship with them).
Ask your friends
Some of them are going to be too nice to you, others too harsh out of jealousy, but you might as well ask for notes from the one or two of your friends that you think can be the most straightforward. The idea that asking your friends for feedback is a bad idea because they may not be experts has one clear flaw: Your friends are your audience. Most people who go see moves do not know how to write or make them, yet they are going to critique your work anyway. It’s not a bad idea to get some feedback from people like that up-front. You will have to guide them, and you’ll probably get a lot of terrible notes from your friends, but hearing about where they are bored or confused is especially helpful since that’s where a general audience may also be bored or confused. Just don’t take your friends notes too seriously, they are indeed biased, after all.
As time goes on, you’ll make friends with other writers or directors, professional readers, producers, and other industry professionals and well trained aspirants who will both be your friends and also be excellent sources of knowledable notes. These are likely to be your most consistently available source of actually helpful notes, provided you return the favor for them when needed. But keep at least one reader in your pool who isn’t a pro, because knowing how the average person responds is helpful, even through all the bad notes you’ll get. (NOTE: Your non-pro friends being a poor audience is mainly true of screenplays, anyway, as those can be confusing and difficult to read for non-experts. Those friends who aren’t pros are actually a great audience for edits of actual films, because they’re the closest you’re going to get to a public test audience without paying for one.)
Take classes
Even some very experienced writers and filmmakers (usually ones who haven’t broken into the A-list yet) still take workshop classes like those offered by the UCLA Professional Program, or labs like CineStory or Sundance. Classes serve three major purposes: (1) providing you with deadlines, (2) providing you with a group of people who are obligated to give you notes, and (3) meeting people with whom you may later exchange notes and perhaps even collaborate with on projects. Classes are the best way to meet people and build relationships that may go from exchanging notes to something more concrete later on.
You may get some terrible notes from classmates, but you’ll also get some very good notes if you pick classes that are at serious places for serious people. Since UCLA offers online classes, there’s no reason to stay in an awful class, but don’t completely discount local courses (especially those at city and state colleges). Be cautious when considering for-profit adult education programs. They rarely offer anything that city and state colleges don’t, and are often overpriced for the quality of teachers and students you’ll be working with.
Getting an MFA is also a way to get a lot of critique of your work. In the U.S., there are the Big Three film schools (UCLA, USC, NYU) and the AFI. But if you can’t go to any of those, there are also other decent programs out there like Columbia, UT, and various others. In the UK, there is NFTS, and other countries have major film schools as well.
Join a writing and/or filmmaking group
Many writing and filmmaking critique groups form out of class or retreat relationships, so the two suggestions are compatible. But even if you haven’t taken any classes, you may find a group in your area through friends, a local college or library, or an online message board. Some regions may also have film organizations (like San Francisco’s now defunct Film Arts Foundation) that have bulletin boards where you can post looking for a group, and which also host events where you can go meet in-person and try to form a group that way.
There are also online sites which function as virtual critique groups. Some are just bulletin board forums, such as those at Save The Cat, where you can discuss craft, meet people virtually, and post requests for critique. But there are also a couple sites, Trigger Street and Zoetrope, which are specifically critique communities in which you must give critiques in order to receive them. The whole purpose of those sites is to have users give each other notes, both to help each other, and so that the highest reviewed projects on the sites can be considered by production companies. Since Trigger Street and Zoetrope are organized forums for exchanging notes, if you give notes, you will also get them.
Only under very particular circumstances — pay someone
Sometimes you’d like notes from a professional reader — the very sort of person who may read your work for a company you sendit to. Surprisingly, this is quite difficult to find, and even more difficult to find at a fair price. The only paid notes I’ve found thus far that are worth the price is Scott The Reader’s $60 notes offer, and sometimes the notes I get back from Wildsound and Austin Film Festival. My general rule is that I will not pay more than about $80 for notes (not consulting, mind you, but a single read and one-time delivery of a packet of notes), unless they are exceptionally amazing and detailed notes. And I’ve not yet found a notes giver that I’d pay more than $80 for. Honestly, in terms of disinterested third-party readers that give decent or better notes, I’ve only found the three mentioned above at all.
Also, many people selling note services are not professional readers, they’re professional consultants. Most professional readers only resell their services outside the studios through festivals (I’ve only found one so far that offers direct service — Scott). Consultants can occasionally be worth working with — even some A-listers work with story and script consultants — if you have developed a personal relationship with them. Most of the successful writers who work with a consultant at all usually work with someone that was a professor or mentor of theirs in their MFA or professional program, or at a retreat, workshop or festival. It’s meeting the person and hitting it off with them that’s most important, though vetting their credits and credentials is also important (con artistry works because those people seem nice and helpful at first, so do your homework when meeting someone new).
For example I always take classes with, and get script notes from, the same professor: Tim Albaugh. I wouldn’t have worked with him as a consultant, though, if I’d just stumbled upon his website. It’s the personal relationship that’s important, because otherwise your chances of feeling ripped-off by a consultant are very high (because many — perhaps most — of them are worse than useless, and those that are good can seem terrible if your styles are incompatible).
Get representation and/or work with a producer
All of these recommendations are especially relevant before you manage to get a manager or develop a relationship with a producer who wants to take an active role in developing you and/or some of your work. Once you do manage to secure one or both of those relationships, your primary notes will come from your manager and/or producer. Most producers and managers will give you excellent, detailed notes and work with you to see your way through implementing them. Their notes will be geared towards making your work sellable by them, and may conflict with your vision for the project. Your job will be to persuade them to stay as close to your vision as possible, while recognizing the issues they’re raising with your material and addressing them in a way that gets at the core underlying problems which may genuinely cause problems for an audience. That’s your job as a writer or director — to understand the material, and address issues with it in order to make it the best implementation of that material possible.
Working with a manager and/or producer will take your notes to the next level — but you’ll also still want to get notes from about five people for each major draft of each project. So keep those friends, mentors and hired readers handy, because you’ll always want a group of people you can trust who will give you notes about your work that are as agenda-free as humanly possible.
Notes on Notes, pt. 3: How to give notes.
Part of being in the industry is giving notes as well as getting them. If you’re a screenwriter, you’re going to wind up trading notes with other writers whose feedback you want on your own work (especially early on). If you’re a producer or director, giving notes is pretty much your entire job description during certain phases of production. Bad note givers will find themselves getting suboptimal results from the people they work with, because if you can’t communicate what you want, how can anyone give it to you?
Also, while notes sessions are different from on-set direction (which will be discussed in other posts), there are similarities, and many of these principles apply to direction: be polite, clear and concise, give the kind of direction you’d like to receive, etc.
Be professional and polite
Successful critiques are ones that are phrased in such a way that you describe the flaws in the work that need correcting in a way that is as positive as you can be without “blowing smoke” and coming off as a phony. Genuine positive reinforcement in a notes session is easy to come by if you let yourself recognize the hard work that already went in to the work, and acknowledge it even as you observe flaws and make recommendations for improvements.
Nobody likes to be told that they are stupid, or that their work sucks, and hearing that in those terms will cause the note recipient to ignore the notes. Giving unnecessarily harsh notes is counterproductive. If you think the person is beyond help simply decline to give them feedback, and if they’re working under you on a production, terminate them. There is never a good reason to belittle or degrade a colleague or subordinate.
Yes, there are assholes in the industry. But most of the ones who are successful are not successful because they are assholes, but in spite of it. Filmmaking is an industry of relationships, and you have to be quite amazing at what you do (or a marketing commodity, i.e. a “star”) for people to be willing to have a relationship with you even though you’re a jerk. Even then, those who are professionals get the best results from people. I know a number of prominent directors, writers, and producers through my work, professional associations, and the festivals and conferences circuit, and very few of them are assholes.
Give notes you’d want to receive
When giving notes, even if the person doesn’t ask, give them the notes you’d ask for if you wanted their feedback. Be as brief as you can with each particular note, while still conveying the point you want to get across. And give as many details as you feel the recipient deserves. For example, when I give notes on friends’ feature screenplays, I usually give about four to ten pages of notes (unless they’re pretty far along, and don’t need it), all of them as precise as I can make them, organized more or less follows:
General Notes
- Overall feeling about the piece
- What I think the theme is, what I think the plot is, and whether or not they are coming together successfully
- Overall feeling about the main character, and what I think his or her arc is, and whether or not its working
- 1 – 3 major moments of confusion, if any
- Any points of confusion that run through the whole script
- 1 – 3 major moments of boredom / being less interested, if any
- Any boring elements that run through the whole script
- Fix suggestions for any of the above
Page-by-page notes
- What I think the scene is about, or should be about, and whether or not it’s working
- Anything in the scene that’s especially confusing
- Anything in the scene that’s especially boring
- Anything in the scene that’s just not working for me (even if it’s not confusing or boring)
- Fix suggestions for any of the above
That structure of note giving — general overview of what works and what doesn’t, followed by specific critiques on each element scene-by-scene — can also apply to notes to directors from producers, notes to editors from directors, and so on. And it applies just as well to shorts, TV shows, and even stage plays as it does to feature film work.
Make your comments clear and concise
When giving notes you should be as precise as possible while still saying what you need to say. Don’t bog down your point with unnecessary details, don’t make tangential comparisons, and don’t make suggestions that are so antithetical to what the writer or filmmaker is trying to do that they’ll just shut it out.
Make the exact point you’re trying to make, even if it seems too direct. Usually clear and concise is not only more useful, but also less painful to the notes recipient than dancing around something thinking you’re trying to soften the blow. Rambling notes often wind up sounding like you think the person is soft or an idiot and couldn’t deal with it if you just made your point, which is insulting.
And definitely use correct filmmaking terminology whenever appropriate — technical language is a shorthand that lets experts exchange ideas about a topic more clearly.
A note like:
The protagonist’s character arc is unfulfilled. You set up his flaw as needing to grow up, but he is just as immature at the end as at the beginning. It may also be hard for an audience to empathize with him, as he never makes amends to the people he’s hurt with his childish stunts.
Is much better than one like:
You set up your protagonist as this whiny, immature dude who’s always messing around with chicks and getting high. I hate people like that. It remind me of my ex-boyfriend, who is a total loser douchebag, and nobody would ever in a million years like a character that’s like that. I mean, come on. He’s like that the whole film. Nothing but weed and chicks the whole time, and he never learns anything about anything. He treats all these girls like they’re nothing but hoes, and in the end, he still treats them like hoes and is high all the time. What a total jerk. Guys like that are just gross. Why’d you have to make it like that, anyway? Who’s going to want to see that kind of crap, where some guy is just acting like a teenager the whole time and we’re supposed to like this twit and what’s that all about? I’d make him a choir boy, who loves puppies and is a complete gentleman tea-totaler, and then people will like him better than the creep you’ve got now.
(Yes, I’ve received notes like that — and even much, much worse ones — but not from professionals.)
Rambling (and, in the example above, unprofessional) notes are going to do two things: confuse and/or bore the notes recipient, and make them think you don’t know what you’re talking about since someone who can’t give coherent notes is unlikely to be seen as someone who can help make the work better. With notes, it’s not about how many things you say, but how relevant each thing is to helping the writer or filmmaker achieve the goals they set out to. As Robert Browning said, “less is more”.
Get the notes back as quickly as possible
The person receiving the notes from you is likely continuing to work, and also receiving notes from others, while you wait to get back to them with notes. This is even true if the person is someone working for you on a project that you’re producing or directing. The longer you wait, the more obsolete your notes may become, and if it’s your project, the more you may be spending to have someone go in a direction you don’t want.
When you’re giving notes as a favor, it can be more difficult to convince yourself to be quick. But you said you’d do it, and being timely does get the responsibility off your plate sooner.
Leave on a positive note
End your notes, whether it’s a written set of notes or an in-person notes session, on something positive. Often the easiest way to get out is a general platitude such as: “great work so far, looking forward to seeing how you make it even better” or “finishing a draft or cut is the beginning of the journey, and we’ve all been there before, so don’t sweat the notes just make them your own and you’ll find your way to a great draft or cut”.
Those will suffice, but even better is to mention something specific you actually liked about the script — a particular character or story point, the writers’ voice, the director’s vision, the editor’s style, whatever it may be — and say that once the bits you’ve given your notes on are as awesome as that, the work will be great.
Giving notes isn’t your opportunity to seem brilliant at someone else’s expense. Rather, it’s your opportunity to seem brilliant by impressing someone with both your insights and your professionalism. Properly given notes will further a “I’ll help you, and you’ll help me” relationship. Improperly given notes can ruin one.



